YouTube has a Restricted Mode that filters out content that is “potentially inappropriate”. Last weekend, some users began to notice that videos that were in any way associated with LGBT people were hidden under the Restricted Mode.
By default, this mode is off, but users can set this mode on manually. The feature relies on “community flagging, age restrictions and other signals” to identify such content.
Blocked videos included one where a lesbian couple was getting married, ones that had the words “gay”, “lesbian” or “bisexual” in the titles, and transgender make-up tutorials. Popular singer Ariana Grande's vlogs, in which she speaks for LGBT people and supports them with advice, were also blocked.
LGBT users voiced their concerns through Twitter, and soon there was outrage.
still not fixed. one of my recent videos "8 Black LGBTQ+ Trailblazers Who Inspire Me" is blocked because of this. i'm perplexed, @YouTube. https://t.co/MrGBmPum1a
— Tyler Oakley (@tyleroakley) March 19, 2017
If you put @YouTube on restricted mode a bunch of our music videos disappear. I checked myself. LGBTQ people shouldn't be restricted. SAD!
— Tegan and Sara (@teganandsara) March 19, 2017
Tyler Oakley, a YouTube celebrity, who has a video about LGBT people who inspire him, tweeted that it was blocked. Similarly, Canadian indie singers Tegan and Sara also pointed out that while some of their videos were hidden, a few other songs “made it past the censors”.
The hashtag, #YouTubeIsOverParty began to trend over the weekend.
They blocked Ariana's anti-bullying vlog where she gave advice to her gay fans I'm done. #YouTubeIsOverParty pic.twitter.com/7Lrm27dbmy
— mayma (@DAILYSTOESSEL) March 19, 2017
sooo why aren't these videos restricted ??? #YoutubeIsOverParty pic.twitter.com/rYJ3U9sEZ6
— juliana (@julianaarayy) March 20, 2017
While it's true that Restricted Mode could be turned off and all the videos would be available, some users said that “that isn't the issue”. The fact that LGBT videos had to be blocked at all, considered "inappropriate", was itself a subliminal statement.
WE KNOW YOU CAN TURN OFF RESTRICTED MODE THAT'S NOT THE ISSUE #youtubeisoverparty pic.twitter.com/wtemvmHjkL
— nick nock (@nicolas_stoiana) March 20, 2017
Just looked at my videos with the "restricted mode" on. Seeing a bit of a theme here...
— fiona ✨ (@neonfiona) March 16, 2017
LGBT+ content not safe for kids @YouTube? pic.twitter.com/KnhayE4h1y
Rowan Ellis, an activist, was the one who brought the world's attention to this issue with a video uploaded on YouTube on Friday.
YouTube creators tweeted an official statement today, saying that they were proud to represent the LGBT community. “The intention of Restricted Mode is to filter out mature content for the tiny subset of users who want a more limited experience,” they said, “LGBTQ+ videos are available in Restricted Mode, but videos that discuss more sensitive issues may not be. We regret any confusion this has caused.”
#YouTubeIsOverParty
— .:..:lÿdïå:..:. (@twentyonedoggos) March 20, 2017
RACISM!
YouTube: meh
GRAPHIC VIOLENCE!
YouTube: meh
POSITIVITY AND LOVE!
YouTube: pic.twitter.com/1EdyqOVufD
the existence of gay people is NOT 18+ and shouldn't be censored. the enemy is not homosexuality the enemy is hate #YouTubeIsOverParty
— riley (@lameassri) March 20, 2017
However, some people were quick to point out the hypocrisy in what is considered “sensitive issues”. They noted that along with anti-LGBT videos, even racist or sexist videos were not blocked.
.@YTCreators Taking down videos of LGBTQ+ couples, and not doing the same to straight ones isn't promoting sensitivity. It is homophobia
— Stephanie Frosch (@ElloSteph) March 20, 2017
Ellis also tweeted that the statement was “ignorant defensiveness”. She went on to say: “I doubt YouTube reached out to many, if any, LGBTQ+ creators to discuss the situation.”
LGBTQ+ youth are wonderful and strong and perfect but also scared and confused and isolated... you're twisting the knife further here.
— Rowan Ellis (@HeyRowanEllis) March 20, 2017