The Supreme Court on Friday said that an appropriate bench constituted by it will pass an order on January 10 for fixing the date of hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute title case.
"Further orders will be passed by an appropriate bench on January 10 for fixing the date for hearing the matter," a bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S.K. Kaul said.
This comes as a disappointment for Hindutva bodies that have been pushing for an early hearing. Various Hindutva bodies like the RSS and VHP have been asking for early resolution of the case and even pressurising the government to bring a new law allowing construction of Ram Temple. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had, however, said no law will be brought in before the court judgment.
Sources said Hindutva bodies are likely to escalate their agitation demanding either government assurance or early court hearing. The Dharam Sansad, a body of Hindu saints, will take a call on the issue on January 31 during the Kumbh Mela in Allahabad.
No sooner had the Ayodhya matter come up before the apex court, Gogoi said it is the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case and went ahead with passing the order. Senior advocates Harish Salve and Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for different parties, did not even get the opportunity to make any submission. The hearing did not even last 30 seconds.
The apex court also dismissed a petition seeking day to day hearing of the case
Now, a three-member bench will be set up for taking forward the Ayodhya land dispute case in which as many as 14 appeals were filed against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgement, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land be partitioned equally among the three parties—the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.
The Supreme Court on October 29 last year had fixed the matter in the first week of January before the "appropriate bench".
Later, an application was moved for according an urgent hearing to the Ayodhya issue by advancing the date, but the Supreme Court had refused the plea, saying it had already passed an order on October 29 relating to the hearing of the matter.
The plea for early hearing was moved by the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha (ABHM), which is one of the respondents in the appeal filed by legal heirs of M. Siddiq, one of the original litigants in the case.
A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court had on September 27 last year, by 2:1 majority, refused to refer to a five-judge constitution bench the issue of reconsideration of the observations in its 1994 judgement that a mosque was not integral to Islam. The matter had arisen during the hearing of the Ayodhya land dispute.
Various Hindutva organisations have been demanding an ordinance on early construction of a Ram temple at the disputed site. The hearing on Friday assumed importance as Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday had suggested any decision on an ordinance on Ram temple in Ayodhya can happen only after the completion of the judicial process.
Modi's comments had come amid heightened demands by Hindutva organisations, including the RSS, for an ordinance for an early construction of the temple.
"Let the judicial process take its own course. Don't weigh it in political terms. Let the judicial process be over. After the judicial process is over, whatever be our responsibility as government, we are ready to make all efforts," Modi had said during an interview, broadcast by several TV channels.
-with inputs from Pratul Sharma