The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to consider listing a PIL challenging the constitutional validity of a provision of the Representation of the People Act, which had led to the introduction of electronic voting machines (EVMs), instead of ballot papers, for polls in the country.
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) N.V. Ramana heard the submissions of lawyer M.L. Sharma, who filed the plea in his personal capacity, that the petition required hearing in view of upcoming assembly polls in five states—Uttar Pradesh, Goa, Punjab, Manipur and Uttarakhand.
“We will see it... I may list it before some other bench as well,” the CJI said.
Sharma said Section 61A of the Representation of the People Act, which permitted the use of EVMs, was not passed by Parliament and hence cannot be imposed.
“I have filed the petition, which is supported with the evidence on the record. A judicial note can be taken note of the case... let the election be held through ballot papers,” the lawyer said.
also read
- WATCH | Congress tweets video of youth voting 8 times for BJP candidate in UP's Farrukhabad, seeks EC action
- EC to demonstrate remote EVM to parties on Monday; Oppn won't support, says Congress
- Explained: Why did EC propose remote voting, what are legal challenges
- EVM is a tool to empower ordinary Indians, says Prasad
The plea, which made the Union law ministry a party, sought declaration of the provision as void, illegal and unconstitutional as there was no provision of EVM.
The upcoming assembly polls in the five states will be held between February 10 and March 10.