The Uttar Pradesh government on Friday told the Supreme Court that it has withdrawn 274 recovery notices and proceedings initiated against anti-CAA protesters in 2019 for damages caused to public and private properties.
A bench of Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Surya Kant said the state government will refund the entire amount worth crores of rupees, recovered from the alleged protesters due to the proceedings initiated in 2019.
It granted liberty to the UP government to proceed against alleged anti-CAA protesters under the new law—Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Act that was notified on August 31, 2020.
The bench refused to accept the submission of Additional Advocate General Garima Prashad that the protesters and the state government be allowed to move the claim tribunal instead of directing refunds.
On February 11, the top court had pulled up the UP government for acting on the recovery notices issued to the alleged anti-CAA protesters in December 2019 and gave one final opportunity to it to withdraw the proceedings. The court warned that it will quash the proceedings for being in violation of the law.
also read
- UP Assembly bypolls: CM Yogi Aditynath launches scathing attack against SP, Congress
- Supreme Court upholds validity of UP Madarsa Education Board Act
- Maha Kumbh 2025: Seven-tier system, AI cameras... a look at the security measures
- UP bypolls: It's a fight between ideology and prestige in nine seats
It had said that the proceedings initiated in December 2019 were contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court and cannot be sustained.
The apex court was hearing a plea filed by one Parwaiz Arif Titu seeking quashing of notices sent to alleged protesters by the district administration for recovering losses caused by damage to public properties during the protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act in UP and asked the state to respond to it.
The plea has alleged that such notices had been sent in an “arbitrary manner” against a person who had died six years ago at the age of 94 and also to several others including two people who are aged above 90.
