The Supreme Court, on Tuesday, came down heavily on state authorities resorting to "bulldozer justice" saying that even if there is one instance of illegal demolition, it is against the ethos of the Indian Constitution.
Halting such demolitions across the country until October 1—when the matter will be heard again—without its permission, the apex court said no property should be demolished without its permission unless they are unauthorised structures on public roads, or footpaths.
The SC bench, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and K.V. Viswanathan, was hearing petitions that alleged that properties of those accused of crime were being demolished in several states.
The SC, which had earlier condemned "bulldozer justice" that is meted out by several states, said, "Heavens won't fall if we ask you to hold your hands till the next hearing."
When Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the bench that a "narrative" was being built over the demolition of properties, the court said, "Rest assured that outside noise is not influencing us."
“In a country where actions of the state are governed by the rule of law, the transgression by a family member cannot invite action against other members of the family or their legally-constructed residence. Alleged involvement in crime is no ground for the demolition of a property," the court had earlier said.
"Moreover, the alleged crime has to be proved through due legal process in a court of law. The court cannot be oblivious to such demolition threats inconceivable in a nation where law is supreme. Otherwise, such actions may be seen as running a bulldozer over the laws of the land," it added.