'India should have a permanent seat in the UN Security Council': Sajith Premadasa

The presidential candidate of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya says he will work to abolish executive presidency

40-Sajith-Premadasa Sajith Premadasa | Bhanu Prakash Chandra

Interview/ Sajith Premadasa, presidential candidate, Samagi Jana Balawegaya

Young men and women queue up for security check outside the Samagi Jana Balawegaya office in Colombo. Lemon yellow and light green colour flags fly high everywhere, and the office appears unusually busy. The party’s presidential candidate and opposition leader Sajith Premadasa walks in, with a smile on his face and folded hands. Sajith spoke exclusively with THE WEEK, explaining the importance of the upcoming election, his promise to abolish the executive presidency and his views on ties with India. Edited excerpts:

India is our closest neighbour, and a strong, powerful and vibrant country. I have always been supportive of India getting a permanent seat in the UN security council, because that would be a reflection of the global political, military and economic situation.

Q/ How crucial is this election for the people of Sri Lanka? Why do you think they should vote for you?

A/ It is a pivotal moment in Sri Lanka’s history. The people will have an opportunity to express their opinion and to provide their mandate for a new approach, for a pathbreaking vision and for changing the old guard. The country has gone through a terrible human and economic tragedy. Catastrophe has engulfed the whole country, affecting children, mothers, youth, everyone. Except for the super rich, every strata of society has been affected. This election will give an opportunity for the people to make a choice against the old approach of protecting the rich and the crony capitalists. Our approach would be to serve all 22 million people of our country. The people also have a choice [of not opting for] extreme socialism and Marxism, which has not proven to be a viable model in modern governance. I am very confident that they will make the right choice.

Q/ You contested the 2019 election as well. Is there a change in the mindset of the people?

A/ In 2019, there was polarisation in society. There was a lot of ethnic and religious extremism. The election took place after the Easter terrorist attacks. And the country was not bankrupt. The administration that came to power in 2019 has bankrupted the country. So this is a post bankruptcy election, testing the people’s will. More and more people are looking for results, for solutions. They want to see the practical, honest implementation of the solutions. They do not want ethnicity-centric racism, religious polarisation and extremism. They want answers to their problems. I firmly believe that my party and my alliance provides Sri Lanka with the best set of solutions that will ensure that we come out of this disastrous situation.

Q/ You have promised to abolish the executive presidency.

A/ It is an important aspect of the policies that we have proposed. We have seen that the executive presidency tends to corrupt, to move towards the concentration of power in the hands of a single person. In a parliamentary system, one would be accountable and would listen to the people. It will be a more participatory system of governance than the authoritarian system which exists now. It is always good to have a system of checks and balances. We don’t want elected dictatorships, a phrase used by Lord Hailsham, back in the 1970s in the UK. We need to have an accountable, responsible and transparent government.

Q/ As far as Sri Lanka’s economic recovery is concerned, do you plan to continue with the IMF? How would you restructure debts?

A/ We have to work within the existing international economic order. And we will work with the IMF. There should be transformations, reforms and changes on a mass scale and a number of corrective measures are needed. The difference between the incumbent government and us is that we believe that the changes need to be done with minimum damage to the people. The present administration has dumped all the burden on the common man and woman, sparing the super rich and the crony capitalists. We need programmes that uphold social justice and equity, that promote growth, rather than contract growth. This will make the economy stronger. We want to grow ourselves. We want to ensure that economic activity and positive economic multipliers are there, so that we grow ourselves out of the problem. And we will work with the IMF. Of course, we do not want to burden the people by taxing them very high. We need to have a humane approach that protects the people and does not victimise them.

Q/ You have been a friend of India. How do you expect India to engage with you?

A/ India is a great power. We want to have a strong, productive, constructive and conducive relationship with India in multiple sectors―politics, international affairs, commerce, trade, economy―to ensure that we grow together. And we have a very scientific, professional approach to decision-making. Our relationship with India will be towards maximising our national interests. India is our closest neighbour, and a strong, powerful and vibrant country. I have always been supportive of India getting a permanent seat in the UN security council, because that would be a reflection of the global political, military and economic situation. I have a very cordial and strong relationship with India. We will make sure that it results in benefiting our motherland, and our 22 million people in a variety of ways.

Q/ How do you assess the performance of the Ranil Wickremesinghe government in the past two years?

A/ He has driven the country to a new normal, which entails forcing millions and millions into poverty, making the micro, small and medium industries go bankrupt and causing the fabric of society to crumble. Do you want stability by bringing unseen suffering on the people? We have proposed that we have to grow ourselves out of this problem. We have to extricate ourselves out of this quagmire through productive, constructive, pro-people and pro-poor growth.